E-Mail


Here's some recent e-mail that I received ... it represents a sample of some
of the better ones : first from Dr. Steven Greer . Next a letter from Joe Oddo, and
Thirdly, a report ( Sightings ) from Robert A.M. Stephens from 11/11/98 ...
Following those are an assorted sample of newer e-mail I've received ... keep
in mind that tons of e-mails arrive daily, & these are some of the more bizzare
and 'interesting' ones that I've gotten out of the last 210 ...

NOTE : Due to complaints, and the 'ownership' of those authoring e-mail,
there are no new postings for the year 2000 ...


@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


Return-Path: webmaster@cseti.org
Received: from acme.sb.west.net (acme.sb.west.net [205.254.224.2])
	by www.seasurf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA06285
	for radioman@seasurf.com; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:42:57 -0700
Received: from pavilion (pm0-37.sba1.avtel.net [207.71.218.37])
	by acme.sb.west.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 463EC24AE3; Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender: mbx1301@west.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 01:19:12 -0700
To: webmaster@cseti.org
From: DrSGreer@cs.com (by way of Tony Craddock (webmaster@cseti.org) )
Subject: Letter From Mr. Woolsey
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: 19990923083006.463EC24AE3@acme.sb.west.net
Sender: webmaster@cseti.org
Status: RO

Tonight I was asked by the editor of a small UFO newsletter (CNI News) to
comment on a recent letter signed by former CIA Director R. James Woolsey et
al regarding my meeting with him on December 13,1993.  Apparently, this
letter was sent to Michael Lindemann for publication in the September 30
edition of the CNI newsletter.

Mr. Woolsey and the others question the accuracy ( or manners) of my
depiction of this meeting in the introduction of my new book
"Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The Evidence and Implications"
(www.DrGreer.com). You can read this introduction on the website for yourself.

Mr. Woolsey et al have a very selective memory of this nearly 3 hour briefing
of a sitting CIA Director.  If anything, and my wife who was present can
attest to this, my description of the meeting is incredibly understated.

In his letter, Mr. Woolsey (now apparently a lobbyist in Washington) implies
that this was not  a briefing but only  a dinner party, and that the dinner
party was not a cover story for the briefing, etc.

It must be understood that it was a friend of the CIA Director, Mr. Petersen
- not myself - who characterized the dinner party as a cover story for the
meeting with the CIA Director. Indeed, Mr. Petersen made the arrangements for
this meeting and hosted it at his home in Arlington VA . He told me and my
wife that even his wife did not know Mr. Woolsey was coming to their home for
dinner until the morning of the briefing.

They claim my characterization and specific references describing the meeting
were inaccurate. Not at all.

Quoting from a sensitive memo FedEx'ed to my home from Mr. Petersen, who made
all of the arrangements with the CIA Director:

    "I talked to Woolsey this morning and he (underlined in the original)
suggested getting together over dinner. He was not aware of your organization
or that anyone was planning such an announcement {regarding UFOs/smg} . This
almost certainly means that , 1)there is an active attempt being made at
lower levels of government to sabotage Project Starlight {the CSETI UFO
disclosure effort/smg}, 2) this group almost certainly has tapped your phones
and is aware of most of the details of your plans..."

    "If we do have dinner with Jim (Woolsey), we will have moved this whole
thing to a much , much higher plane and in doing so raised significant red
flags for those who don't want to see this succeed. Operation Starlight  will
become a serious (underlined) threat to the status quo."

"Meetings with people like Woolsey must be kept very closely guarded. I have
not even told Diane {Mr. Petersen's wife/smg} about it."

"You must understand that great principalities and powers will oppose your
plans..."

Then, all in bold:  " Remember: the most powerful people in the world will
have a deep, compelling interest in our activities and will use everything
(in italics) at their disposal to effect  their objectives."

And so forth.

Mr. Petersen, who heads up a national security think tank called The
Arlington Institute, was working very closely with me during those days and
had substantial experience in national security and military matters.

From the above quotes it is obvious that this was no mere dinner party! The
dinner party was only the cover - and the stakes were and are every bit what
Mr. Petersen describes.

As for other information contested in Mr. Woolsey's letter, I stand by the
account. Regarding Mr. Woolsey's UFO sighting : This was first conveyed to me
by his long-time friend Mr. Petersen and was later confirmed at the briefing.

In my new book, I reproduce the document handed to Mr. Woolsey during the
briefing. In this document, which I handed personally to him, we recommend
that Mr. Woolsey and the President move decisively towards a near-term
disclosure of the UFO/ETI matter. Just a dinner party?

I am certain that Mr. Woolsey knew the UFOs were real and that a very deep
cover project was running that area - a project which had kept the CIA
Director himself in the dark.

Later in their letter, Mr. Woolsey et al complain that my conduct
"contravenes ....simple manners".   Manners?  I was on Larry King Live over 9
months after the meeting with the CIA Director .  But this meeting was not
disclosed, because Mr. Woolsey was still in office and I felt decorum
necessitated silence regarding such meetings. I have behaved with the utmost
restraint and have disclosed such matters only after very careful
consideration.  Indeed, I would not be writing this letter except that
Lindemann at CNI plans to publish Mr. Woolsey's 'sanitized ' account of the
briefing and has compelled me to write. (Why Mr. Woolsey et al would make
such a letter available to Lindemann is beyond me.)  I made no pact of
silence regarding such meetings. And since disclosing this meeting, I have
always portrayed Mr. Woolsey and his wife as people seeking  the truth of
such matters and as people who wanted excessive secrecy ended. Perhaps I was
wrong...

Manners? Indeed - if anything, perhaps I have been too restrained.

Good 'manners' as it pertains to this subject means speaking the truth - and
being willing to stand up for it.  Good manners would be public servants such
as Mr. Woolsey, Dr. Woolsey and others doing the right thing and working
ardently for the truth to be told regarding UFOs and ETI.  Good manners
should mean being more concerned for the health of our democracy and the
constitution than covering-up the import and purpose of such a briefing.  And
good manners would be joining in the effort to disclose a matter which, once
made public, would allow earth-saving technologies to be revealed which would
halt the wholesale destruction of our eco-system.

As a very busy emergency doctor in NC, with 4 young daughters, I assure you
that we did not make that brief trip to Washington DC on December 13, 1993 to
sight-see or just to have dinner. But rather, we made that journey to plead
for the end of super - secret projects which are being withheld from the
people so that our democracy could be made whole and our children's future
made sustainable.

The current attempt to minimize, obfuscate or cover-up the purpose and
details of this briefing with the CIA Director is quite disconcerting -and
strange. Why Mr. Woolsey and the others would write such a letter is unknown
to me. We can only speculate. I stand by my account.  But now, perhaps the
time has come for ''we the people' to demand that current and former
officials such as CIA Director Woolsey and the President be held responsible
for the the lack of action on resolving this most pressing problem.  After
all, we pay their salaries, provide their perks - and they represent us. It
is not I who needs defense. My actions over these long years have spoken my
commitment. But we still await action from our elected and appointed
officials.  As the earth groans under the weight of the errosive and
corrupting influences of big money and special interests,  I wonder just how
much longer we shall have to wait...

I think it is time that the American people demand that the waiting time be
over.

Steven M. Greer M.D.
CSETI Director
23 September 1999
Albemarle County Virginia

This letter may be reproduced but ONLY in its entirety.

                        copyright 1999 Steven M. Greer M.D.


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Return-Path: joeoddo@tnweb.com
Received: from mail.tnweb.com (www2.tnweb.com [207.65.218.14])
	by www.seasurf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA24460
	for radioman@seasurf.com ; Fri, 3 Sep 1999 14:48:53 -0700
Received: from joeoddo [207.65.218.195] by mail.tnweb.com
  (SMTPD32-4.07) id AE811D004C; Fri, 03 Sep 1999 16:32:49 CST
Message-ID: 001001bef656$2cc0b640$c3da41cf@joeoddo
Reply-To: "Joe Oddo" joeoddo@tnweb.com
From: "Joe Oddo" joeoddo@tnweb.com
To: radioman@seasurf.com
Subject: Look what we started!
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 1999 16:49:18 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0

X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-PMFLAGS: 570950016 0 1 P20AA0.CNM

Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Joe,
I was contacted last night via email by Bob McCoy, he has a very =
interesting web site with some cream 'o the crop interviews and =
contacts,  he no longer wants to deal with maintaining his web site and =
only wants to do interviews.

He has asked me to take his entire web site and consolidate it into my =
existing site. And wants to continue producing interviews.  He is =
planning to redirect his domain names to my site once the consolidation =
is completed.

www.exnews.com www.exnews.net www.exnewsnetwork.com=20

Truly amazing, and he wants nothing at all in return, he only wants the =
info out there.

We are not sure when we will announce it publicly, but hope to have the =
sites integrated some time next week.

What do you think?

Thanks for helping keep me motivated. =20

Sincerely,
Joe Oddo


------------------------------------------------------------------------


Montana UFO Sighting Update  - Weather Clears...It's Still There

By Robert A.M. Stephens

from : sti3818@montana.com
Dated : 11-11-98

ST IGNATIUS, MONTANA

 --The ongoing UFO sightings have continued into the 11-10-1998 time frame.  
Cloud cover broke for this night and the UFO, alone,  was there as it had been 
only lower in altitude and slightly further south toward the town of St. Ignatius, 
Montana, itself roughly 10 miles south of Ronan along the southern edge
of the sprawling Mission Valley.

Due to nearly 100% cloud cover with snow and storm over the last several 
nights viewing has been null from 11-6-1998 to current.

Observation was made by local law enforcement as well as workers at the 
manufacturing facility mentioned in previous posts and other civilians who  
happened to notice the craft and reported same. Total on witnesses as of 
this writing has exceeded 600 area wide.

There has been no further reporting by outside news sources other than that 
posted already.  Lake county sheriff office personnel have continued to look 
into the matter with no availing information over and above what visual obser-
vation has provided.  Local law enforcement in the towns of Ronan, St. Ignatius,  
and Polson have done the same.  They too have garnered no conclusive data 
on this sighting.

Reporter has yet to successfully witness    UFO firsthand but is making arrange-
ments to attempt this in forthcoming nights when conditions abide for such. In so 
doing two Navy SEAL high resolution digital compasses will be set up four miles 
apart along the north / south route of highway 93,  thus providing for triangula-
tion, distance from the center of highway 93 --- a logical azimuth anchor point to
the observed craft,  size of craft, altitude,  and if detected movement can be 
attained, thus, inherent speed in relation to observed location.

The viewing time and conditions for this latest sighting was from 1:27AM to 3:34
AM when cloud cover obliterated the viewing window. During this time of clear-
ing the sky was cloudless, exceptionally clear, stars in abundance, temperature 
in the 5 degree  F range, no moon as it had set over the mountains to the west,
no wind at surface.  However, at 20,000 feet ASL the west to east winds are a 
steady 120 MPH over the Rocky Mountain Front complex coming from WWS 
blowing toward the EEN in a direct line.  Witnesses reported the conditions were
clear enough to single out a defined shape behind the previously described light-
ing of the craft but it was too vague to accurately describe.  Several witnesses 
used hunting type binoculars for observation but they have yet to be interviewed
by this reporter.

Craft was 8 nautical miles distant from viewing locale at manufacturing facility &
at altitude of approximately 14,000 feet ASL,  and 4 miles further south than pre-
vious sightings since  10-16-1998.

ERRATA -------

Numerous emails to reporter have suggested this sighting is everything from ours,
balloons,  holograms.  From experience  over 19 years with NASA at various test
sites around the country and overseas as well as a Navy SEAL active until 1990
and Reserve Status since that date to current, reporter can testify this sighting
studied from interviews and reports from law enforcement,  witnesses,  and the 
NORAD/Fence database program, anomaly is nothing in our paucity for under-
standing.  It is not of our technology.  It is not an apparition. It is a physical 
vehicle with mass of unknown origin.

It is an unknown and in Aerospace/military vernacular,  listed as a 'GRAY'.

The only remotely close related vehicle  that could exhibit anything related to 
this anomaly is the Aurora high propulsion VTOL capable aircraft.  However, 
tests and performance of this vehicle precludes the following:

It is and has been grounded for further structural tests at Area 51,  Edwards Air 
Force Base, [Dryden],  and at parent contractors test facilities at Palmdale,  CA,  
at Lockheed,  McDonnell Douglas, and Northrop.  Aurora has not flown since 
1-9-1998. Its only known public observation was during test flights over Area 51
on the afternoon of June 21,  1992,  and video taped by cameramen from NBC
News.  Subsequent tape was shown and narrated on the NBC Nightly News the 
following night with narration by Mr. Brokaw,  the nightly news anchor.

Aurora cannot hover in air at that altitude,  temperature
differential,  present cross wind, nor can it evade F16F class aircraft.

Aurora is a small craft in size comparison to the F-117

Montana anomaly is guessed (by witness account) to be somewhere at 600 feet
on a side and triangular in shape.  Aurora is of the shape of a June bug, 1/700
th this size.

 Aurora could not be seen with unaided  eye at this distance of observation as
reported under any conditions.

Thus,  this UFO is not Aurora
____________________

The 'Fence'  protocol  at NORAD is a remarkable program made up of many tech-
nicians monitoring a series of interleaved grids coming from Geostationary high 
orbit satellites.  The office tracks all 9,653 man made objects in space
orbiting Earth.   These include a pair of gloves from Gemini 6 and some dozen 
washers dropped on a repair mission on STS-51A on a shuttle mission
and every other orbiting object of artificial origin along with the occasional met-
eorite that may remain in Earth's space for some overly long seconds.. If some-
thing untoward enters into the tracking field (the fence) it then begins a series 
of tracking logarithms to track speed, location, altitude,  departure angle,  mass,  
heat,  and inherent velocity.  From there it runs a test for itself to confirm that 
whatever it is is not something we have in space. From there a management 
program kicks in called,  'Intruder Assessment'. If a series of democratic proto-
cols weigh out then the next step is to start a series of visual confirmations with
our own air assets.  Stealth 117A and or SR-71 are dispatched to attempt inter-
cept.  From there the 'Fence' protocols go through a series of 'what is' formats 
until the intruding element is either confirmed to be something from us or an un-
known.  Unknowns are called a 'Gray'.

This is because the unknown is there in space but is not ours.  It is not a 'target 
white'  (friend) nor a 'target black' (foe).

Thus far the Montana UFO is a 'Gray' as listed.  It is also the 117,443 unknown 
to be catalogued at  the 'Fence' office at NORAD or SAC since 1966, globally. 
It is suspected they (NORAD) have moved any one of three Keyhole deep-look 
satellites into position in high Earth Orbit to watch this bogey when it appears 
since conventional ground based air assets have failed to acquire craft for con-
firmation due to vehicle exhibiting phasing or some other type of eluding of recon 
aircraft.

UFOs are not referred to as such in the military/NASA parlance.  They are either 
a 't-white' (target white) if friend,  't-black' (target black) if a foe.  Unknowns are 
a 't-gray'  or sometimes a 'tg'  for an acronym if not of Earth origin.  The Montana 
UFO is not of Earth origin.

Reported by:

Robert  A.M. Stephens

Contractor,  NASA
Shuttle Documentation Program
St. Ignatius,  Montana


------------------------------------------------------------------------


                       Rowland Network Communications

                                  [Image]

                           Network Control Center

      A note from the Web Hosting Service division of Rowland Network
                              Communications.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Mail Server Blocking

     Due to the major spam problem on the Internet and the intentional
     harassment that goes on, Rowlandnet has resorted to mail server
     filtering and blocking measures, to keep spam and harassing
     messages from being received by our users. This will result in
     email attempts to our clients, being rejected and a bounce
     message returned to the sender.

     The domains that we service are: artbell.com, strieber.com,
     caus.org, rowlandnet.com, enterprisemission.com,
     scripturessay.com, mesachurch.org, daytaco.com, among others.

     In an effort to inform you, the web site visitor, who may be
     trying to contact us, and cannot because of the actions of
     others, who have forced us to filter your entire ISP or one of
     your mail servers, we will list the servers and the reason for
     blocking them.

     You may wish to contact your provider, if they are listed here,
     and inform them you don't appreciate their tactics and the end
     result of you being blocked from other servers around the
     country. I believe I'm not the only service who must block these
     sites.

     Blocked for Unsolicited Commercial Email

     Entire Domains
          news.korea.ac.kr, magclub.com, picpost.com,
          netaddress.usa.net, dialsprint.net, eurochannel.de,
          kiss.com, spiderweb.com.au, xxxmailer.com, mrnewsletter.com,
          youngbillionairesclub.com, 203.208.7.27

     Certain Servers of ISPs
          raven.prod.itd.earthlink.net, mo.pub-ip.psi.net,
          az.pub-ip.psi.net, la.pub-ip.psi.net

     Individual Accounts
          rreed@gnwmail.com, vegasodds@newmail.net

     Blocked for Unsolicited Distribution EMail Lists

     Entire Domains
          egroups.com

     Blocked due to Harassing Email

     Individual Users
          magic.cats@ica.net, drjoseph@pacbell.net, scott@basec.net,
          scottdlevy@hotmail.com, HoneyCup99@aol.com,
          snuzzagator@att.net, thesun1@juno.com, sunny413@juno.com,
          sunny414@juno.com, sunny415@juno.com, sunny416@juno.com,
          sunny417@juno.com, bodell@bigfoot.com,
          robert_bodell@hotmail.com, seadog28@hotmail.com,
          Bob264@hotmail.com, stellarvision@hotmail.com,
          bluesky@sb.net, delion@microtec.net,
          director@projectduat.com, ve3uls@vaxxine.com,
          vegasduo@earthlink.net, xantist@hotmail.com,
          cleodotcom@yahoo.com, cleodotcom@hotmail.com,
          abracadabra_707@hotmail.com, sti3818@montana.com,
          backwards@reversespeech.com, blackwidower@cyberdude.com,
          MATT00006@aol.com, MATT0006@aol.com, MATT00006@hotmail.com,
          MATT0006@hotmail.com, jk684@cleveland.Freenet.Edu,
          mrufo51@hotmail.com, Artbellian@aol.com,
          director@borderlands.com, rmbinternational@yahoo.com

     Domains that have blocked us.

     coredcs.com
          These people (Core Technical Suport) were the ones who
          insisted that a customer problem of theirs was our fault. We
          had a long discourse on a DNS problem. They finally got
          pissed off and refused to even talk about it. They blocked
          our server so we could not communicate with them. Any users
          of coredcs.com can write to us, but we cannot write back.

                            RowlandNet Home Page


------------------------------------------------------------------------


backwards
serious problem with the theory of reverse speech
Fri Oct  8 03:13:56 1999 

!--- IP address = 206.96.80.185 --- 

For more than two years now, i have had serious problems with the 
theory of reverse speech the way it stands now.

For a start it is not as cut and dry as i have always presented it as 
being. The reverse phrases are elusive and illusionary and can rarely
be found word for word by other people. With all the students I have 
trained over all these years, I have yet to have a transcript turned in 
that contains more than a few common reversals. In other words, 
students document totally different reversals on the same track. 
Sometimes these reversals will communciate common meaning, 
othertimes they will not. Furthermore, students will tend to doc-
ument the same "type" of reversals. For example, I will usually 
document short concise reversals, other people will tend to doc-
ument long sentences, others again will document half sentences 
etrc etc - and this documentation and listening style will tend to 
remain the same no matter how many years of training a person 
has had. All this tends to suggest that the reversals are a creation
of the listener, more so than the speaker.

Secondly, reversals can rarely be heard by others without prompting 
- even I have this problem after 17 years of practice. Unless I am 
told beforehand what the reversal says, i am usually unable to hear
it. Conservely, though, if the reversal is NOT there, it is difficult
to hear no matter how many times someone asks you to hear it.


Thirdly, on the same vein. is the instance of "Layered Reversals"
- where several different reversed phrases can be heard on the 
same section of tape depending on what is listening for.


Fourthly, different people with different biases will come up with 
totally different reversals and interpretations on the same tape 
depending on their biases. We saw a graphic illustration of this 
when the Art Bell/Oates settlement tape was published. Different 
people found reversals on me that showed I was either a conman 
or shark / or i was genuine in my apology / or i was lying / or i was 
under stress - four different outcomes depending on whether you 
liked me or not!


All of thse facts point to reverse speech as being unreliable 
in both documentation and interpretation. Yet, at the same 
time, duing my 17 years of work, i have a sufficient number 
of reversals that CONVINCE there is something to this but 
what it is???? That requires far more work to determine. 
Certainly it is not as cut and dry as i have presented it as 
being.


The other significant concern I have  is the instance of the 
phenomenon known as reversal reaction. There is a major 
major down side to reverse speech in the form of the many 
neagative reactions in creates in people. I see with most new 
students who come through - in the first few weeks they will 
become moody and irritable - dreams will increase dramatically.
- In session work, i will see the client obtain releif for the 
issue they came to see me about but at the same time, i will
see many other negative issues arise that can be devestating
in their impact. So concerning have been these negative side
issues that i have actually stopped seeing clients now until 
i can get a better handle on it. 


I have often advised people to NOT lsitneing to their own 
reversals of those of their spouse - I say this, because i 
ahve seen diasasters arise by doing this. I have seen 
marriages break up and I have seen people become moody
and despodant - sometimes down right psychotic from 
lsitneing to their own reversals. On the same token, is the
person who analysing a tape - eg: the analyst - after many
many hours of listening, it will cause personal problems 
similar to the effects of "reaction" - usually the analyst is 
blind to these effects and they will increase substantailly 
over time. This is why there are few practising analysts in 
the field after the many 100s i have trained.


Also, I am VERY concerned by the emergence of many 
splinter RS groups each spouting their own particular 
brand of RS - the latest being Time Distorted Speech 
on Clay's board. This is fragmenting the field and making 
it even less reliable and consise - its is becoming just 
nother new age fad with little reliablity and consistency.


Lu's study with constant reversals showed up these 
inconsistencies greatly - hearing varies from person to 
person.

I could go on and on but the bottom line is this. RS is NOT 
cut and dry - the theory I have been putting forth is becoming 
less and less set in stone the further we continue gathering 
data. 

I dont know what the answer is. I know some aspects of RS
are very real, but many others are not including its reliability.
It is NOT reliable and it causes emotional instability in both 
the analyst and person listening to their results.


This observation that I painfully come to over the last couple 
of years is IDENTICAL to the ones that were reported to have 
been made by the alledged govt research into RS in the late 
70s. According to rumor, the research team degenrated into 
an emotional whirlpool of tempers and confusion, and resulted 
in a final summation of "It is too unreliable to be used"

So where to from here ----- i dont know. There is something to 
RS but I dont have all the answers and some of my other 
answers have been wrong.

Input??


--------------------------------------------------------


backwards
Specific comments -  2/ Psychic phenomena
Sat Oct  9 19:36:51 1999

Like it or not - the fact is that psychic phenomenon has been obsreved 
frequently around RS - the most common being odors, secondly sounds 
in the air around, thirdly, levitation, and fourthly, shadows and visions 
in physical space.

I have observed all of these, and other analysts have experienced some 
of them depending on how long they have been doing RS - usually two 
years or more is the start point (ie: they begin to occur after doing RS 
for 2-3 years)

Some have suggested this is Satanic or occultic. I dont believe that 
at all. They said RS was satanic way when too. If you believe that 
then every christian on the face of the planet is satanic cos they all 
have reversals. If you beleive that psychic pheneomena is satanic 
then you must also believe that "satan" has the power of creation, 
and in my bible that is blasphemy.

I believe that ALL things were created by God, and all abilities given 
to man were given to him by God, and we are only just beginning to 
awaken to them.

According to RS, the sense of smell is a very strong human sense. We are both transmitting and receiving odors all the time as another form of unconscious communication. I think that what is happening wiht the odors at least is that after many years of constant RS listening, the right brain or uncosncious has been stimulated to a point that what was once unconcsious communciation (odors) has now become conscious. Input? -------------------------------------------------------- backwards
I have met others as well....... Sat Oct 9 20:11:09 1999 ...who have experienced odors all their life. It is not as uncommon as people may think - the smell of roses has also been reported around saints and holy men etc. In RS, the metaphor Rose signifies spiritual enlightment or awakening. So please dont get me wrong by saying it only happens around RS - it does not of course, but i do think that prolonged contact to RS enhances it. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: <> Received: from worldway.net (newton.worldway.net [209.153.199.20]) by www.seasurf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15976 for ; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 10:29:17 -0700 Received: from www.seasurf.com ([204.245.233.233]) by worldway.net with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #3) id 11a0J0-0001Nx-00 for webmaster@psychicspy.com; Sat, 09 Oct 1999 17:29:14 +0000 Received: from ip-a54.seasurf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.seasurf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA15967; Sat, 9 Oct 1999 10:29:11 -0700 Message-Id: <199910091729.KAA15967@www.seasurf.com> To: eotl@west.net Cc: webmaster@psychicspy.com From: radioman@psychicspy.com Subject: Secret Navy 'Stealth Ship' 'ZEUS' Sighted ! Date: Sat, 9 Oct 99 17:29:12 +0000 X-Mailer: Seasurf WebMail v1.1 X-Mailer-Info: http:// SERVER Status: U Hi Jeff : For Immeadiate Release ... ^ ^ SIGHTINGS : Secret US Navy Stealth Ship ^ ^ After checking with legalities, the story is now ready for the public ... Recent sighting of the Navy stealth ship 'ZEUS' was seen recently at an unknown port in the Pacific. One of the rare times it docks, it was seen and photographed by three individuals ... The ZEUS, one of two stealth ships, was origionally a 'cable- laying ship' converted fro Naval use. A 'friend' who is currently aboard another Navy vessel, in a civilian-contractor capacity took the photo. After seeing a years' worth of his personal photos, I noticed the 'ZEUS'. It looks like a digitally created 'cartoon ship' with all smooth surfaces - no sharp corners of any kind. It appears roughly as a 'ship outline', and has some below deck windows ... that's where the similarity ends. The color is WHITE, and sort of 'textured'. Like the stealth aircraft, there are NO corners, nor sharp lines, but all rounded. The photo was taken from a dock, showing others also taking a photo as well. Based on the size, judging from the autos on the pier, as well as the people, it's probably quite small, no larger than a PT boat, or a 'mini' cruise ship. It's a surveillance ship, supposedly outfitted with electronic gear for evesdropping, and little defensive capabilities, I'm told. The color allows it to be invisible in the Arctic, and it's frequently in Northern waters, among icebergs. Rumors are it frequents Russian waters as well. While I can't verify it's radar invisibility, it certainly is optically invisible ... When my friend brought over his photo album, I removed the two photos of the Zeus and attemted to 'copy them' - that's where you can appre- ciate the stealth qualities of this intersting ship. Using a state- of-the-art digital camera, and a portable 1,000 watt light/reflector as a camera copy stand setup here at work, I was UNABLE to duplicate the photographs at all. Normally, in my webmaster duties, I frequently duplicate still photos, using the digital camera/ light stand setup, with usually good quality. Despite some 'generation loss', the photos do work on my website ( AREA 51 photos are an example ). In this case all that shows up on the digital 'negative' is the total 'outline' of where the ship should be, all white, and suprisingly it does vanish into the background ! Some windows, and masts were seen floating in the photo, but I immeadiately got the idea, that when viewed at a distance, those details too would be 'invisible' as well. Dissappointed that I couldn't duplicate the photo, nor even see any detail on the 35 mm negative, I gave up trying to have a copy of the Zeus. We were both surprised that any detail was seen in the photo print at all. Conclusion : the 'digital cartoon' ship is truly a stealth ship, optically invisible at even a short distance, especially given its normal area of operations in the North Pacific amoung the background of iceburgs ... My friend was somewhat concerned over 'non-disclosure' clauses for military sub-contractors, but we reasoned that the ship usually never docks except for maintainance, and is probably supplied it's supplies and crew by other ships ... if it has a home port, it is an unknown ... Perhaps more information in another year ... ^ ^ 73's radioman http://psychicspy.com ^ ^ -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: <> Received: from worldway.net (newton.worldway.net [209.153.199.20]) by www.seasurf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12039 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:12:50 -0700 Received: from webcrunchers.com ([209.76.146.203]) by worldway.net with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #3) id 11ddkF-00074d-00 for radioman@psychicspy.com; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 18:12:23 +0000 Received: from [24.12.33.17] (24.12.33.17) by webcrunchers.com with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.2); Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:04:36 -0700 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199910191739.KAA10059@www.seasurf.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 11:12:10 -0700 To: radioman@psychicspy.com From: John Draper Subject: Re: Hi from radioman ... >HI OM : >Just wanted to thank you. You'll get a lot of e-mail now that >Art Bell re-ran your interview, I'm sure ... Well, if you had noticed, Art gave out my OLD WELL mail box, " and even though I had a link to my Real Email box on my site, I didn't get that much Email. I was on ICQ, and consistantly had about 25 people waiting in line to talk to me. My site got about 25,000 hits.... my ol G3 was honkin... >A contemporary of yours, John Faulke, now John Bell was a >'mentor' of mine in 1975 and taught me more than just BASIC >computer programming on an Apple 1 motherboard ... WOW - I remember him. What is he doing now? >I learned that John had done time for making/selling Blue >Boxes previously, and looking back, as I worked for him at >his tiny computer repair shop in Redwood City, CA in '75, >me fresh out of college, that John did a lot more than just >introduce me to the microprocessor ... Is he still there? >What I really learned was a 'spirit' of investigating, that >continues to this day - beyond what even being a ham would >teach me. Now I'm one of the most Federally monitored websites >anywhere, and I frequently embarrass the Military enough for >them to remove sensitive 'materials' that I find there ;-) >Again, thanks for being such an influence on John, who did >pass on a curiosity to me that got me into the mess I'm in today ;-) >73's radioman >http://psychicspy.com CRUNCHMAN -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: webmaster@cseti.org Received: from acme.sb.west.net (acme.sb.west.net [205.254.224.2]) by www.seasurf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04027 for radioman@seasurf.com; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:59:50 -0700 Received: from pavilion (pm7-30.sba1.avtel.net [207.71.222.130]) by acme.sb.west.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D07E24B69; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: 4.2.0.58.19991023173615.0299b390@west.net X-Sender: mbx1301@west.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 17:38:32 -0700 To: webmaster@cseti.org From: Tony Craddock webmaster@cseti.org Subject: WHEN DISCLOSURE SERVES SECRECY Mime-Version: 1.0 Status: U WHEN DISCLOSURE SERVES SECRECY Copyright 1999 Steven M. Greer M.D. Ending the secrecy surrounding the UFO/ET subject is a laudable goal. It is long overdue. It would transform the world in ways both simple and profound. And yet it is fraught with danger. The covert projects which have been running UFO related programs for nearly 60 years are not interested in a disclosure which upsets their apple cart. They want such a disclosure to transform their apple cart into a freight train. And they potentially have the power and connections to do it. There are multiple scenarios attending the disclosure of the UFO subject-and not all of them have the best interests of humanity at heart. Elsewhere, in the new book 'Extraterrestrial Contact: The Evidence and Implications' (www.DrGreer.com) I write about the kind of disclosure the world needs. An honest one. An open one. One which replaces secrecy with democracy. A disclosure which is peaceful, scientific and hopeful. But then there is the disclosure the powers that be would like to see: Manipulated. Calculated to consolidate power and engender fear. Configured in such a way that chaos and a deepening need for Big Brother is carefully inculcated into the masses. We have seen the plans and it is not a pretty picture. I write this as a warning. A warning that the wolves in sheep clothes are very cunning indeed. And have almost limitless resources. Most who work with them do not even know they are wolves. Indeed, it is likely that many of the wolves have been convinced that they are sheep. The UFO matter is not so much a mystery as a matter deliberately obfuscated and mystified. Confusion and a lack of clarity serves the larger covert goal of keeping it off the long- range radar of society while power and plans are consolidated quietly. And the one thing more dangerous to society than all this secrecy is a planned, contrived disclosure run by the keepers of the secrets. For years such plans have been made - to be unfurled at just the right time. During a time of great expectation. Of social confusion. Perhaps of millennial madness? I have personally met with a number of people who are very involved with such plans. I do not speculate here. Be aware: The disclosure of UFO reality is being planned very carefully. It will assiduously follow a scheme to spin the subject in just the right way - the only way which will further redound to the glory and power of the secret-keepers. It will be a false disclosure - one born out of the age-old bane of human existence: selfishness and greed. Greed for power. Greed for control. Greed for domination. We must be mature and informed on such matters. Only a vigilant and informed public can see through such deceit - and correct it should such a plan be unfurled. Every citizen needs to know that great good can come from the truth being known. But the mature citizen must also recognize that the 'truth' can be spun and spun again -until the goals of those who crave secret and overt power are met. Consider: One scenario for disclosure is that the UFO and Extraterrestrial subject is acknowledged in a way which is scientific and hopeful. Excessive secrecy which lacks executive branch and congressional oversight is ended. Humanity begins to entertain open contact with other civilizations, with peaceful engagement as the goal. Technologies which are currently suppressed are allowed to be disseminated: Pollution ends. An economy of abundance and social justice is firmly established. Global environmental destruction and mind-numbing world poverty become a faint memory. Zero-point based energy devices transform the world. Electro-gravitic devices permit above ground travel without paving over the world's precious fertile farm land. As an ET once told Colonel Philip Corso, " Its a new world, if you can take it...". This is the disclosure which we are working for. But the disclosure envisioned above could have happened in 1950. It did not - Why? For such a disclosure would lead to the total transformation of the status quo. Centralized energy systems would be obsolete. Oil would be useful only for lubricants and synthetics. The geo-political order of today would be a thing forgotten: Every country and people on earth would have such a high degree of progress and advancement that all nations would have a seat at the global table. Power would need to be shared. Peaceful acknowledgment of life from elsewhere would make the earth seem like the very small, organic homeland which it is. The vast trillion dollar global military - industrial sector would be reigned in. And a universal spirituality might dawn... But remember, there are hugely powerful interests who dread this scenario. For them, it is the end of the world as they know it. The end of centralized, elite power. The end of a controlled geo-political order which today leaves nearly 90% of the people of earth barely one step out of the stone age. And they do not wish to share the power they wield. Now, let me describe the 'disclosure' which would make these covert control programs happy. This is the false or contrived 'disclosure' which has only one clear goal: The further consolidation of their power and their paradigm. It has to do with fear, not love. With war, not peace. With division and conflict, not unity. It is the dominant paradigm - but it is slipping away slowly. And a carefully orchestrated disclosure of the 'facts' of the UFO and ET subject could secure their power. This is the disclosure which is to be dreaded. This is the disclosure to watch out for. This is the disclosure which is already occurring. My meetings over the past 9 years with covert operatives who have worked on UFO related programs have introduced me to some characters right out of a spy novel - and then some. Whether in private high tech industry, at the Pentagon or at a midnight meeting in a private mansion, a theme has emerged. It is one of immense, though currently hidden, power. It transcends government as we know it (at this point the government of 'We the people...' has been made irrelevant on this issue). And the theme has two main strands - the eventual covert militarization of the ET subject and a weird covert religious strain which can only be viewed as bizarre. Here, we find some very strange bed-fellows indeed. War mongers and militarists in cahoots with industrialists who share a certain bizarre eschatological bent: A dark view of the future, featuring an extraterrestrial Armageddon - or at least the threat of it. Such a theme supports retrograde and fanatical religious causes as well as deeply covert military-industrial plans to expand the arms race into space. In fact, the big players in the so-called 'civilian UFO community' are tied into such beliefs and agendas. It strains credulity, I admit, but here is what we have found by penetrating these operations. From a military-industrial perspective, the disclosure of choice is one which frames the UFO/ET issue in a threatening manner. If a threat from space can be established ( as President Reagan liked to say) then the entire world can be united around the need to fight such a threat. This would ensure trillion dollar plus military - industrial spending well into the next century, and beyond. If you think the cold war was costly, wait until you see the price tag for this ' protection' from the 'threats' in space: The trillions spent on the cold war will look like a blue light special. Retrograde and fanatical religious groups, similarly, have great vested interests in fulfilling the promise of Armageddon. An eschatological paradigm, well enshrined in the belief systems of those running covert UFO projects, is supported by the portrayal of a cosmic conflict in the heavens. Voila! We have the necessity of spinning the UFO/ET issue in the evil invading aliens (translates in religious terms as demons) direction. Indeed, this has already been accomplished , courtesy of the 'civilian UFO community' and the tabloid media (which at this point is virtually all media...). Additionally, there is a subtext which can only be viewed as thinly veiled racism. You will note that part of the 'new myth' regarding UFOs involves the 'good ET s' , which invariably are described as 'Pleidians' who are 'handsome' white, blue-eyed Aryan appearing types. Naturally, those 'evil, bad ET s' are darker, shorter, look funny and smell funny. Please. Such clap-trap would have us trade age-old human racism for an extraterrestrial variety. This nonsense and propaganda could only make Hitler proud. In one lengthy meeting with a multi-billionaire, I was told that he gave great support to UFO activities which propel the so-called 'alien abduction' subject into public awareness because he wanted humanity to unite around fighting this 'alien threat'. Later, this very influential figure informed me that he believed these demonic ET s were the cause of every set back in human history since Adam and Eve. Sound familiar? Military interests, which are heavily involved in covert projects which hoax ET events, such as human military- related abductions, have a shared goal of demonizing the UFO/ET phenomenon. Doing so lays the foundations for the fear and dread necessary for an organized opposition to all things ET. And this subserves the long - term need to provide a rationale for an expanding global military even should world peace emerge. In fact, under this scenario, 'world peace', or strictly speaking peace on earth, could be secured by the world uniting, eventually, against the 'threat from space' referred to by President Reagan. (By the way, personally I believe Reagan was the victim of disinformation specialists who surrounded him and who manipulated him into the statements he made on this subject.) Under this scenario, currently being gamed and 'disclosed' courtesy of the trial - balloon UFO 'community', we would get peace on earth - in exchange for inter-planetary conflict. One step forward, ten steps back. Wonderful. Such a false and contrived 'disclosure of the truth' regarding UFOs and ET s would, then, subserve agendas held by powerful covert interests in both the military - industrial sector and those of a strange collection of religious fanatics, who pine for Armageddon - and the sooner the better. Lest the reader think such a strange amalgam of militarists and cult-like religious interests are unlikely, remember the weird views of the Third Reich. Or more recently, the views of one US Department of the Interior cabinet secretary during the Reagan years named James Watts. It was he who, not knowing a microphone was still on and recording his comments, stated in the 1980s that we did not need to worry about all these environmental problems since Armageddon was coming soon and the world would be destroyed anyway...This bizarre view, held by a man who shaped and applied policy for the Interior Department of the US Government, was later reported in the general media. At the time a comical footnote perhaps. But what does it say about the degree to which such beliefs may be shaping covert UFO policy - and specifically disclosure plans? We have found that such views - bizarre as they may seem to most - are heavily represented in covert policy development on the UFO subject. And most disconcerting of all: This strange mixture of military cosmic saber - rattling and bizarre religious beliefs are the dominant forces shaping both the 'civilian UFO community' and the planned eventual 'spin' on UFO disclosure. Let the buyer beware. To the rational and intellectual, such views seem ridiculous. Why, you might ask, would anyone want a cosmic war in space, an Armageddon and the destruction of the earth? To comprehend this, you have to get inside the head of people who hold such beliefs - people like James Watts. In his case, why worry about a little bit of deforestation, air pollution and areas of dead oceans if the entire world is going to be destroyed in a couple of years anyway? But the thinking goes further than this. Because such fanatical thinking has within it the concept that as a result of the Armageddon we will see the return of Christ- and with it the good people's salvation. Now, people are free to believe what they want. But what we have found is a deliberate influencing of covert policy on UFOs by such beliefs. Some of these people want Armageddon - and they want it ASAP. Strictly speaking, the militarists and war-mongers, itching to 'kick some alien butt' as it was said in the movie Independence Day, may actually only want a pretext to justify their existence and get the world to eventually spend huge sums of money on a perceived (if contrived) threat from space. But in some cases - high up on the food chain of the covert entity running UFO secrecy - the two views meet. A place where militarism and eschatology merge. Where Star Wars and Armageddon join. In tracing the history of both the UFO civilian community and the covert policy-making group concerned with UFOs, we have found a growing penetration of the latter into the former. So much so that at this point there are projects which ostensibly are innocent civilian initiatives but which in reality are totally controlled and financed by 'cut-outs' from ultra-secret projects. Moreover, our careful penetration of such projects yielded the disturbing finding that deep-cover black project operatives are working closely with alleged civilian researchers, journalists and UFO glitterati. CIA and military intelligence operatives are working with civilian 'think tank' heads, alongside very wealthy business people who are eschatologists, and being advised by 'civilian' technologists and scientists - who are themselves proponents of bizarre religious belief systems involving the end of the world and ET s.... Thus, the new 'chosen ones' have been assembled. They are planning your disclosure on the UFO/ET subject. They are owned by the money whores and power brokers doing the bidding of the secret entity which runs UFO projects to begin with. And it all looks like a civilian initiative. So innocent. So well-intended. So 'scientific'. And by the way, the sky is falling courtesy of ET and we need your money and your souls to defend against it. Do not be deceived. You need to be awake to the darker scenarios which some would like to thrust upon the world. And you need to know that there are alternatives. If a 'disclosure' is unleashed on the world which is xenophobic, militaristic and terrifying, know that it comes from the spinmeisters of secrecy - regardless of how respectable the person or group may appear to be. And remember: Part of this disclosure plan involves the use of UFO look-alike devices made by humans in an attack on earth or military assets of earth. This would be a well-orchestrated use of advanced human technologies to hoax an ET attack - all for the purpose of disclosing the truth with the desired military-oriented spin. In such a scenario, most of humanity will be deceived into believing the threat from space has arrived - and that we must fight it at all costs. This is nothing more than long-term social security for the military-industrial complex. There must be people who can expose this fraud. But why should we wait for these darker scenarios to be unleashed on an unsuspecting world? Here is another idea: Why don't 'we the people' unite and launch a disclosure which resembles the first one described above. An honest one. One which leads to peace, not war. To a sustainable and beautiful world, free of pollution and brimming with abundance, of all types. One which reaches out into the unknown, instead of firing particle beam weapons into the darkness of space. Additionally, we welcome those who can come forward with first hand knowledge of the machinations referred to in this paper and who wish to expose such madness to contact us at http://www.cseti.org. The one thing the darkness of secrecy cannot tolerate is a spotlight shining right on it. And the more of us holding the light, the better. Evil steps in when good people do nothing. This is a lesson taught through thousands of years of human history. We stand at the beginning of a new time, and a new world awaits us. But we must embrace it, and help create it. For if we are passive, others will have their way - at least in the short run. Steven M. Greer M.D. CSETI Director Albemarle County, Virginia 21 October 1999 ---------------------------------- Return-Path: Received: from mail.montana.com (mailB.montana.com [199.2.139.117]) by www.seasurf.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA10387 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 18:14:06 -0800 Received: from montana.com (blk8-195.montana.com [208.26.210.195]) by mail.montana.com (8.9.0/8.9.4) with ESMTP id TAA25400 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:24:00 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3702D61B.8DECAB25@montana.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 19:12:47 -0700 From: "Robert A.M. Stephens" Reply-To: sti3818@montana.com Organization: Stillwater Mills-Aerospace X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: radioman@seasurf.com Subject: ?? X-Priority: 1 (Highest) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Are you really being shut off by the NSA ? Before you do, add my link and website below to your page please. surpirsed I haven't had any fallout on posting of Silver Veil Satellite data. -- -- sincerely, Robert A.M.Stephens NASA Documentation Program Stillwater Mills-Aerospace KSC-PIB/shuttle/MSF 406-745-3818 sti3818@montana.com http://198.116.116.10/gallery/arts/samples/.html http://cdfnet.com/RAMSES/ http://www.cdfnet.com/INTERVIEWS 

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@


<<BACK